Sunday, October 13, 2013

Predictions, Portents, and Probably?


Dear Blog Reader.

I hope that this finds you doing well. I am doing fine. Last week, I wrote about the travails of caterpillars and their attacks on the unsuspecting and a bit naïve. I was trying to be kind; hoping that the reason the victims were in contact with these poisonous little buggers is that their parents had not raised them right. Parents who did not know better because they were not paying attention in high school biology or they did not have a jar to collect insects and then prematurely send lightning bugs to lightning bug heaven because no lightning bug ever survives no matter how much grass you put in the jar or how many holes you put in the lid with a 16 penny nail and hammer. So caterpillars are attacking the most vulnerable among us. Except for my fun and games playing splat at 16 mph, humanity seems to be doing very little to rid ourselves of the scourge of children’s allergic reaction pictures on Facebook.

I was sharing the vision of gut splatters on the road with a co-worker and they said “yeah, what do those blond caterpillars mean for how bad the winter is going to be?” I am thinking “pay attention here. The topic that I am talking about has nothing to do with winter weather severity and everything to do with vector analysis and practical story problem skills.” If a bike leaves the house 4 miles away travelling 16 mph and the caterpillar decides to cross the 20 foot country road going a foot a minute how far will the biker have to swerve from his usual track of 2 ft from the shoulder? Why are we more reliant on caterpillars for our winter weather forecasts rather than as excellent story problem references?

My co-worker went on to make a classic entomological mistake. “I have seen a lot of those blond wooly worms. Doesn’t blond mean that it will be a mild winter?” By misidentifying a regular old death deserving caterpillar as the sage winter prognosticating wooly worm, they had doomed themselves to a winter of discontent. Armed with poor information, their winter will be without the guideposts readily available to old timers through out the centuries. I was going to offer subtle correction; “what you saw was not the traditional wooly worm. They are brown and black in segments.” However, I could tell that their knowledge was so tightly held and my explaining skills so poor that frustration would ensue. It was time to cut my losses and go back to work on a spreadsheet. “Sure looks like a mild winter,” was all I could muster.

We do put a lot of faith in these signs of the future. We seem to be searching for any sign of what it coming; for the forecast. It doesn’t matter how good the prognosticator is at their craft. They could have never have gotten it correct and we will still give them credit and believe a least a little bit what they are predicting for our future. I am chief among suckers on this topic. I am holding fervently to the idea that the Super Bowl will be played in a blizzard in New York this next year after the Farmer’s Almanac made their bold prediction in September. It will serve those big city New Yorker fancy pants right.

I say bold because it was quite specific; a specific meteorological phenomena on a specific weekend in a specific spot. Most seers know to keep it vague and leave the results open to interpretation. Last year the wooly worm and the persimmon tree predicted a snowy early winter. Their advocates hung their hat on the brutal 3 inch blizzard on December 26. Yep, the wooly worm’s esteem catapulted based on the overreaction of the meteorological community and a panic prone public. The misappropriated attribution of accuracy has boosted his reputation to such an extent that people are rushing out and misidentifying our diminutive prophets and raising the status of your common blond caterpillar.

Insects and weather are not the only predictors in which we put our faith. This was made very clear to me while visiting my daughter and son-in-law earlier this fall. Being very smart people, they read a lot of books and in this case internet articles about books. They came across a book that makes personality and life success predictions based on your birthday. The article made it very clear that these predictions were NOT astrology which makes the same predictions based on . . . your birthday. No these predictions had the force of science behind it.

These scientists had culled the supermarket check out lane for stars of another type. Celebrities from all walks of life were included. From Einstein to Cher, they were all there. After star identification, these scientists categorized their personality traits and spewed forth that everyone born in the same 7 day period has the same traits. It strikes me that the sample would be a bit skewed towards nihilistic, narcissistic, nutcases. How are you going to overcome your obvious personality flaws if you were born this year on July 3rd when you are following in the foot steps of Tom Cruise?  You are doomed; you poor cute little nutcase you.

As Ludicris (sorry all of you September 11 babies), as ludicrous as it may sound we do admire our stars. The ancients loved them in the sky and we, like the Greeks and Romans, look to them up on our Mt Olympus and read the oracles of their lives on the end cap in front of the checkout line. Now we worship at their feet in hopes that their good fortune and coping skills will reflect however dimly on our lives. I think that many of us are susceptible to this transference. I am. I read the article, looked at the Amazon description, read an excerpt. I was almost hooked by the part that predicts relationship compatibility based on the respective birthdays of the couple.

I am sorry to say that the Lovely Miss Beverly and I have been living a lie for the past 28 years. Our passion should have flamed out about 26 years ago if you believe people who have made it an academic pursuit to study the likes of Elizabeth Taylor and Kim Kardashian. Maybe we would be better off choosing a bit stronger foundation for predicting the future.

Or just not worry about it, and deal with it when we meet.
 
Take care,

Roger

No comments:

Post a Comment